Archive for November, 2004

Christine Gregoire, Please Sit Down!

Disclosure: In 2000 and 2002, I was elected as a Republican precinct committee officer, so of course I voted for Dino Rossi. In fact, I voted a straight Republican ticket this year, despite my misgivings about most of the Republicans on the ticket. Dino Rossi was the only Republican for whom I felt much enthusiasm. (I hear good things about Rob McKenna, the Attorney General-elect, but I’ve never seen him speak, unlike Rossi, who really impressed me at a 48th District GOP meeting a while back.)

Christine Gregoire, having lost the gubernatorial election twice now, is expected to call for either a partial or complete manual recount, which might well take us past January 10, 2005, when a new governor is scheduled to be sworn into office.

Ms. Gregoire, give it up. The race is essentially a tie, but you’ve come out on the losing end twice. It’s going to cost perhaps hundreds of thousands of dollars for you to find out that the race is still essentially a tie. You ran a lousy campaign which any Democrat should have won easily:

This race was yours to lose, and you did. Now, give it a rest.

 

Other Parties, Other Presidents (Part II)

Well, I had hoped to go into as much depth with the other parties as I did with those rascally Constitutionists, but the time before the election has evaporated. So here’s a brief overview of the other candidates on the Washington state ballot.

Libertarian: Michael Badnarik

The Libertarians have my sympathy because they, like the Constitutionalists and (at least in years past) the Republicans, want to reduce the size of government. But things are getting a little wacky in Libertarian land.

Green Party: David Cobb

Not much here for which I can vote. The Greens think “The unjust, illegal and immoral war in Iraq must be brought to an end now.” They also support single-payer, universal health care, proportional representation, a “living wage” (increasing the minimum wage to $10.00 an hour, with adjustments for inflation), an end to discrimination against “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, and Queer” persons (I don’t know what Intersex means, and I don’t know what the distinction is between Queers and “Lesbians” and “Gays”.) There’s more, but you get the point. About the only thing I can really stand with the Greens on is some restrictions on the political activites of corporations, though I would restrict all political spending by all corporations, including labor unions and non-profit advocacy groups. (More on this another time.)

Independent: Ralph Nader

Ralph thinks the US can give way to a UN peacekeeping force (for which the US will pay) who can ensure stability while Iraq builds its own democracy. (I think Ralph’s nuts.) He’s also running on universal health care and against corporate crime and greed. His tax program taxes wealth instead of wages. He has a seven point plan to end poverty. In short, Ralph is running a 1960s idealism campaign for the 2000s.

Worker’s World: John Parker
Socialist Equality Party: Bill Van Auken
Socialist Workers Party: James Harris (no web site)

The usual group of cranks and nut jobs, who haven’t figured out the meaning of the fall of communism. The Worker’s World Party web site carries slogans like “People’s Needs Before Profits - For Socialism, Against Capitalism.” All three groups are concerned with the rights of unions to organize. The WWP wants a minimum wage of $15/hour. The SEP calls for a 30-hour work week (at a 40-hour pay scale). All of these groups call for an immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq.

The purpose of voting for one of these groups is not so much to actually elect them, as to help ensure ballot access for them in future. If you live in a state where the outcome is pretty much already determined (like Washington), and you find one of these to be to your liking, go ahead and vote for one of these groups. If you don’t find one to your liking, feel free to write me in. That’s M-C-P-H-E-E-T-E-R-S. Happy Election Day.

 
  
Close
E-mail It