Afghanistan Revisited
Back to Afghanistan. As you may recall, I
recommended in October that the US
should invade Afghanistan and occupy the country for several decades in
order to firmly plant the seeds of democracy in that troubled country. From
the information available at the time, it looked like the U.S. was going to
have to do the hard work of toppling the Taliban and rooting out al-Qaida in
the Afghan caves. In fact, almost all the ground troops involved in those
activities have been Afghans of the Northern Alliance or of the various
Pashtun tribes. This had the effect of keeping Americans out of harm’s way,
but at the cost of forfeiting much of our legitimacy in keeping troops in
Afghanistan to ensure a satisfactory future for the country over the
long-term. Instead, a U.N. mediation team has put together an agreement
among the various Afghan factions for a temporary coalition government.
(By the way, can anyone give me an example of one of these U.N.-backed
interim governments that have successfully made the transition to a stable
democracy, or even to a stable government? I can’t recall any of these
United Nations nation-building experiments that has worked at all.)
Admittedly, my vision of a slow U.S.-guided transition to a free,
democratic Afghanistan was and is optimistic. The Afghan people tend
to rally together to throw off foreign occupation (the Soviets failed there,
as did the British a hundred years earlier). But, ultimately, the U.S.
toppled the semi-stable Taliban regime, so we have a responsibility to help
put into place a new stable government for the country.
